not squeeing
Oct. 28th, 2013 09:11 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mmegaeraNot because the Seahawks didn't win, because they did -- 14-9.
But because that was one of their most singularly butt-ugly showings this season. And their standards for butt-ugly? Are insanely high for a team that's 7-1 halfway through the season.
At least they managed to keep St. Louis out of the end zone at the very last second, which would have lost them the game.
Ye godlings.
But they won [g]. And some basketball player who was on during halftime to advertise that their season starts tomorrow says he thinks it's going to be the Broncos vs. the Seahawks in the Super Bowl. I hope he's right about the Seahawks and wrong about the Broncos [wry g].
As I said, ye godlings.
But because that was one of their most singularly butt-ugly showings this season. And their standards for butt-ugly? Are insanely high for a team that's 7-1 halfway through the season.
At least they managed to keep St. Louis out of the end zone at the very last second, which would have lost them the game.
Ye godlings.
But they won [g]. And some basketball player who was on during halftime to advertise that their season starts tomorrow says he thinks it's going to be the Broncos vs. the Seahawks in the Super Bowl. I hope he's right about the Seahawks and wrong about the Broncos [wry g].
As I said, ye godlings.
